What's inside
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. This post may contain affiliate links at no extra cost to you.
Our Top Picks
DEWALT 15 Amp 8-1/4 in. Compact Portable JobsiteOne Size22.75 x 22.75 x 13 Inches54 poundsCheck on Amazon
Quick verdict
The DeWalt DWE7485 is the better compact table saw for a small shop that values portability, fence accuracy, and a smaller footprint. Its rack-and-pinion fence is fast to adjust and usually stays parallel without much fuss.
The Skil TS6307-00 is the better value if you need more cutting capacity. Its 10-inch blade cuts thicker stock than the DeWalt’s 8-1/4-inch blade, and its 25-1/2-inch rip capacity gives you an extra inch of room on the right side. For occasional DIY work, cabinet parts, shelving, and construction lumber, the cheaper Skil is entirely reasonable.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Neither saw replaces a full-size cabinet saw. Both are jobsite-style machines with some vibration, modest dust collection, and fences that require sensible setup. The choice comes down to whether you prioritize compact handling and fence refinement or blade size and capacity.
DeWalt DWE7485 vs Skil TS6307-00 specifications
| Feature | DeWalt DWE7485 | Skil TS6307-00 |
|---|---|---|
| Motor | 15 amps | 15 amps |
| Blade | 8-1/4 inches | 10 inches |
| Maximum rip capacity | 24-1/2 inches | 25-1/2 inches |
| Cut depth at 90 degrees | 3-1/8 inches | 3-1/2 inches |
| Cut depth at 45 degrees | 2-1/4 inches | 2-1/2 inches |
| Approximate saw weight | 46 pounds | 51 pounds |
| Fence adjustment | Rack-and-pinion | Rack-and-pinion |
Cutting capacity and real small-shop work
The Skil’s 10-inch blade gives it the clear advantage when cutting thick material. It can cut a 4×4 in two passes, while the DeWalt cannot make that cut in one pass. The difference also matters with construction lumber, thick hardwood blanks, and glued-up worktops. At 90 degrees, the Skil reaches 3-1/2 inches compared with 3-1/8 inches for the DeWalt.
For typical sheet goods, the difference is less important. Both saws can rip plywood, MDF, shelving, and hardwood boards effectively. A full 4×8 sheet is awkward on either machine without an outfeed table or support stand. The DeWalt’s 24-1/2-inch capacity is enough to rip a standard sheet down the middle after a manageable first cut, but the Skil gives slightly more clearance.
Blade availability favors the Skil. Ten-inch table-saw blades are widely stocked and available in many tooth counts. The DeWalt’s 8-1/4-inch blades are common enough, but the selection is smaller and can cost more. If you already own several quality 10-inch blades, the TS6307-00 makes better use of them. For either saw, a 40-tooth combination blade is a practical starting point; use a higher-tooth-count blade for cleaner plywood edges.
Fence accuracy and adjustments
Both saws use rack-and-pinion fence adjustment, which is a major advantage over inexpensive slide fences. Turn the knob and the fence moves in a controlled, repeatable way. This is especially useful when switching between narrow rips and wider panels.
The DeWalt’s fence system feels more refined. It locks firmly, is easy to read, and generally needs less correction after moving it. The fence also stores on the saw, reducing the chance of losing a small but essential component. That matters in a cramped shop where accessories tend to migrate.
The Skil fence is good for the price, but inspect it during setup. Confirm that the fence is parallel to the miter slot and that the locking mechanism clamps evenly from front to back. A fence that points slightly toward the blade can pinch the workpiece and increase the chance of kickback. A fence that points away from the blade usually leaves a rougher, less accurate cut.
Neither saw should be trusted blindly out of the box. Check the blade’s relationship to the miter slot, verify the 90-degree stop, and make a test cut in scrap. A few minutes with a combination square can prevent a full afternoon of inaccurate parts.
Portability and shop-space requirements
The DeWalt is the more convenient machine to carry. Its smaller blade and compact body make it easier to move from a shelf to a workbench, and its roughly 46-pound weight is manageable for one person. It is a strong fit for a garage shop where the saw must be stored after every project. If portability is your main concern, compare it with other compact jobsite table saws.
The Skil is about five pounds heavier, but the extra weight contributes to a more substantial base and larger cutting platform. The TS6307-00’s folding stand is useful when you need a working height without building a bench. It still takes floor space when opened, and its stand is not as rigid as a permanent shop base. On uneven concrete, check that all feet sit solidly before cutting long stock.
For either saw, an outfeed table is more valuable than a minor difference in stand design. A simple level platform behind the saw helps prevent long boards from tipping, lifting the workpiece, or pulling the operator off line.
Power, dust collection, and safety
Both machines use 15-amp universal motors. They have enough power for normal plywood and dimensional lumber, but they are loud and can bog down in thick hardwood if you force the cut. Feed steadily rather than pushing harder when the motor slows. A dull blade creates heat, burns, and extra load on the motor.
Dust collection is functional rather than excellent. A shop vacuum connected to the rear port captures some sawdust, but fine dust will still escape around the blade and housing. Use a vacuum rated for fine dust and wear hearing and eye protection. A table-saw push-stick and featherboard set is inexpensive insurance for narrow rips.
Use the supplied riving knife and guard whenever the cut allows it. Remove them only for operations that specifically require it, such as certain dado setups—and verify the saw supports that operation before buying a dado blade. Keep hands out of the blade path, especially when a narrow offcut can become trapped between the blade and fence.
Which one should you buy?
Choose the DeWalt DWE7485 if your work is mostly plywood, trim, shelving, small furniture parts, and repeated narrow rips. It is easier to store, lighter to move, and has the stronger overall fence and adjustment experience. Its 8-1/4-inch blade is not a problem for most sheet-goods work.
Choose the Skil TS6307-00 if you want maximum cutting depth for the money, already use 10-inch blades, or regularly cut thicker lumber. It is also the sensible pick for a first table saw when the lower price leaves room in the budget for a good blade, vacuum, and support table. Those accessories often improve results more than spending extra for a slightly more polished saw.
If your shop work involves wide hardwood panels, frequent furniture production, or tight joinery tolerances, save for a heavier saw rather than expecting either compact model to behave like a cabinet saw. For occasional small-shop work, however, both are capable—the DeWalt is the more polished compact tool, while the Skil delivers more saw for less money.
FAQ
Which one should you buy?
Related guides
Worth a look next
- Skilsaw SPT99T vs DeWalt DWE7485: Which Compact Table Saw Is Easier to Transport?
- DeWalt DWE7485 vs Milwaukee 2736-21HD: Which Compact Table Saw Is Easier to Transport?
- DeWalt DWE7485 vs Bosch GTS15-10: Which Compact Table Saw Has Better Rip Capacity?
- DeWalt DWE7491RS vs Bosch GTS15-10: Which Jobsite Table Saw Handles Dado Work Better?
- Makita KP0800K vs DeWalt DW680K: Comparing Hand Planers for Door Fitting
- How to Choose a Spiral Cutterhead for a Benchtop Planer


