What's inside
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. This post may contain affiliate links at no extra cost to you.
Michelob Ultra, Miller Lite, Corona Premier, and Budweiser Select 55 are among the best low-calorie beers compared by calories, but the right choice depends on whether you prioritize the lowest calorie count, lower carbohydrates, fuller flavor, or better value. Most figures below use a standard 12 fl oz serving; package labels can change, so check the can or bottle when exact nutrition matters.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Our Top Picks
Quick comparison: the best low-calorie beers
| Beer | Calories | ABV | Carbohydrates | Serving used | Flavor profile | Typical value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Budweiser Select 55 | 55 | 2.4% | 2.4 g | 12 fl oz | Very light, crisp, mildly grainy | Usually inexpensive |
| Michelob Ultra Pure Gold | 85 | 3.8% | 2.5 g | 12 fl oz | Clean, dry, lightly floral | Mid-range |
| Corona Premier | 90 | 4.0% | 2.6 g | 12 fl oz | Light-bodied, dry, gently sweet malt | Mid-range to premium |
| Michelob Ultra | 95 | 4.2% | 2.6 g | 12 fl oz | Crisp, restrained malt, mild hop bitterness | Mid-range |
| Miller Lite | 96 | 4.2% | 3.2 g | 12 fl oz | More noticeable malt and hop character | Often strong value |
| Coors Light | 102 | 4.2% | 5 g | 12 fl oz | Very crisp, cold-fermented, lightly sweet | Often inexpensive |
| Heineken Silver | 95 | 4.0% | 2.9 g | 12 fl oz | Light lager with mild hop and grain notes | Premium lager pricing |
| Athletic Brewing Run Wild IPA | About 70 | 0.5% or less | Varies by package | 12 fl oz | Citrusy, hoppy, fuller than most light lagers | Premium |
Nutrition values are commonly published figures, rounded where appropriate. Non-alcoholic beer recipes and nutrition panels can vary by flavor and production batch, so confirm the current package label.
Our picks by buying situation
| Your priority | Best fit | Why | Main compromise |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fewest calories in a conventional beer | Budweiser Select 55 | Only 55 calories per 12-ounce serving | Lower 2.4% ABV and a very light body |
| Low calories with more alcohol | Michelob Ultra | 4.2% ABV at 95 calories | Flavor is restrained rather than rich |
| Lowest carbohydrates among mainstream options | Michelob Ultra Pure Gold | About 2.5 grams of carbohydrates | Less widely available and generally more expensive |
| More flavor from a light lager | Miller Lite | Noticeable malt and hop balance at 96 calories | Slightly more carbohydrate than Ultra |
| Mexican-style lager character | Corona Premier | Dry, light profile with 4.0% ABV | Premium pricing and a relatively delicate flavor |
| Hoppy flavor with minimal alcohol | Athletic Brewing Run Wild IPA | Hops provide flavor without the alcohol level of regular IPA | Costs more and is not a full-strength beer |
Head-to-head comparisons
Budweiser Select 55 vs. Michelob Ultra
Select 55 wins the calorie contest by a wide margin: 55 calories versus 95 in the same 12-ounce serving. However, its 2.4% ABV is substantially lower than Michelob Ultra’s 4.2%. Choose Select 55 when calorie reduction is the primary criterion and a lighter, less alcoholic drink suits the occasion. Choose Michelob Ultra when you want a conventional-strength light lager without moving far above 100 calories.
Michelob Ultra vs. Miller Lite
These beers are close in calories and alcohol: 95 calories and 4.2% ABV for Michelob Ultra, compared with approximately 96 calories and 4.2% ABV for Miller Lite. Miller Lite generally offers a more evident malt and hop profile, while Ultra is drier and more neutral. For the same general calorie budget, Miller Lite is the better flavor value; Ultra is the better pick for a particularly crisp, unobtrusive beer.
Corona Premier vs. Heineken Silver
Both are premium-positioned light lagers around 90–95 calories and 4.0% ABV. Corona Premier is usually softer and drier, while Heineken Silver retains a little more of the grain and hop character associated with Heineken’s lager style. Neither is the cheapest option, but either can be worthwhile when brand style and drinkability matter more than saving the last few calories.
How serving size changes the comparison
A “low-calorie” label is only useful when the serving sizes match. A 16-ounce tall can contains one-third more liquid than a 12-ounce can, so its calories and carbohydrates are approximately one-third higher.
For example, using Michelob Ultra’s listed 95 calories per 12 ounces:
- 12 ounces: 95 calories
- 16 ounces: 95 × 16 ÷ 12 = approximately 127 calories
- 24 ounces: 95 × 24 ÷ 12 = approximately 190 calories
The same scaling applies to carbohydrates. If a beer has 2.6 grams of carbohydrates per 12 ounces, a 16-ounce serving contains roughly 3.5 grams before any label-rounding differences. This is why a regular 12-ounce can of a slightly higher-calorie beer can contain fewer calories than a large can marketed as “light.”
Calories, carbohydrates, and alcohol are not the same measure
Calories come from alcohol as well as carbohydrates. Alcohol contributes about 7 calories per gram, while carbohydrates contribute about 4 calories per gram. As a result, a beer with very low carbohydrates is not necessarily the lowest-calorie beer if it has a higher ABV.
Budweiser Select 55 demonstrates the tradeoff: its low calorie count is paired with a lower alcohol percentage. Michelob Ultra has nearly twice the calories but also provides a conventional light-beer ABV. If your decision is based on carbohydrates alone, compare the carbohydrate number; if it is based on total energy, compare calories; if it is based on drinking occasion, consider ABV and serving size as well.
Value: calculate cost per standard serving
Pack prices vary by location, package size, taxes, and promotions. A useful comparison is cost per 12-ounce serving rather than the price printed on a large pack. Suppose a 12-pack costs $15:
- $15 ÷ 12 cans = $1.25 per 12-ounce serving
- A 24-pack at $24 works out to $1.00 per serving
- A premium 12-pack at $20 costs about $1.67 per serving
This calculation reveals why mainstream light lagers often offer better value than premium low-calorie beers. A premium beer may have only a small calorie advantage, while costing 30–70% more per serving. Non-alcoholic craft-style beers frequently cost the most because they use specialized brewing and alcohol-removal processes.
Flavor and ownership realities
Light lagers are designed around refreshment, so their thin body and modest aroma are intentional rather than defects. Serve them cold, because warmer temperatures make their limited malt and hop character more noticeable. Once opened, the carbonation fades quickly; resealing a can does not preserve the original texture.
Low-calorie beer also tends to be less forgiving of poor storage. Keep cans and bottles away from heat and direct sunlight. For bottled beer, light exposure can create unpleasant “skunky” aromas, particularly in beers packaged in clear or green glass. Cans generally provide better protection from light.
For a flavor-first choice, look toward Miller Lite or an alcohol-free IPA. For a calorie-first choice, select a very-low-calorie lager such as Budweiser Select 55. For the best balance of calorie count, ABV, availability, and price, Michelob Ultra remains one of the most practical all-around picks.
Bottom line
Choose Budweiser Select 55 for the lowest conventional-beer calorie count, Michelob Ultra Pure Gold for a low-carbohydrate lager, Miller Lite for stronger light-beer flavor, Corona Premier for a dry Mexican-style profile, and Athletic Brewing Run Wild IPA for hop character with minimal alcohol. Compare every option using the same 12-ounce serving, then factor in ABV, package price, and the flavor you will actually enjoy drinking.